I thought the EOS 40D was fast :shock:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8h2AMllP0Y
Dave
I thought the EOS 40D was fast :shock:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8h2AMllP0Y
Dave
im telling ya... Canon FTW
400whp/384tq - E85 - stock turbo
334whp/317tq - 91oct - stock turbo
Sponsored by www.speedelement.com / www.rallyinnovations.com / www.bajadesigns.com / www.sportsracingfuel.com / www.gruppe-s.com / www.vexmotorsports.com / www.detailaddict.com
Tuned by Bryan@GST Motorsports
Proud supporter of www.gstmotorsports.com / www.xperformance.com
There's no doubt Canon dominates the professional market. I just prefer Nikon for the feel and value. If I could get ANY of the Mark's for a good deal I'd be all over it. There's a Camera show on Jan 6th in Hayward. I will make a post.Originally Posted by MtsEvoIX
Dave
honestly, the fps[frames per second] only matters if you're doing a lot of sports/ fast movement shots. so 20d,30d,40d, even an XTi would do good
www.chrishophotos.com [photoblog]<br />member of DFINED.ORG
+1, but no one can deny that that is pretty bad ass.Originally Posted by chris
true haha. some people are amazed at me shooting 5fps =X
www.chrishophotos.com [photoblog]<br />member of DFINED.ORG
this video kind of cracked me up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYAx-ajaERM&NR=1
Rafael S.
The value of all of that equipment far exceeds the cost of a Evo X with full dealer mark up :shock: Five days toset up :shock: Nice find!Originally Posted by BOOSTonHanD
Dave
I bought one of these last year for my side job. absolutely amazing with the 24-70mm 2.8 L lens in low light.
visit my updated swimsuit model gallery<br /><br />designer of the evolution x badge