Re: Evo X MR vs BMW 135i at Reno/Fernley
Originally Posted by
steevo8
Originally Posted by
fiaevo.com
runflats carry a 140 rating they are sticky as hell. They are right about the evo, daily driving get old after a certain amount of time, other than that, the car is a blast. Also,BMW claims that open diff is advantageous to their set up's that is why no new bmw has an lsd.
sticky doesnt mean its a fast tire. You tracked your 335i so don't tell me rhode tires are as good as advans. Why do you think every car magazine has bitched about them on every test they ever do? Cause they suck arse, that's why.
I'm not saying that the x isn't a good car, but to bash the 135i because its a few seconds slower around a track seems rather stupid.
Doo relax...lol. The run flats are re050 bridgestones, I did drive it on the track and I was surprised how well they handled. I am not bashing the 135i I actually implied that they are right about it the car, it is a good daily driver and ok for track day so over all it will be a more useful car. MR is a mitsu that we all love.
Sorry if I confused you mighty Steevo8 ...please dont hurt me.........
WWW.METHODBUILT.COM<br />PHONE 415 839 0058 , 415 839 0069<br /><br /> HELPING YOU KEEP THE SHINY SIDE UP SINCE 2002<br /><br />Those who know, do not speak, those who speak do not know